
Re: disc brakes - caution, another long read with part numbers and price
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disc brakes - caution, another long read with part numbers and prices
- From: Doug Daniel <dougdaniel50@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:02:15 -0800 (PST)
will all this work on a C body ? 65 dodge monaco
--- On Sat, 12/19/09, Mike and Linda Andrusiewicz <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mike and Linda Andrusiewicz <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: disc brakes - caution, another long read with part numbers and prices
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Saturday, December 19, 2009, 11:18 AM
>
> I'm with Steve on this one. OEM is the best way to
> go. I've done at least 5 brake swaps from front drums
> to disks on Mopars in the past few years. Mostly A bodies,
> and 1 B body. I like the slider types with 10.87"
> rotors. I usually just buy parts (master cylinder, hoses,
> calipers for a 73 Dart). All were manual drum/disk.
>
> On early A bodies, you just need to bring over the UCAs
> with the spindles/rotors/bearings/calipers. The early
> A drum UCA uses a small BJ, the later UCAs (73+) use the
> large pattern BJ.
> I've used the A body spindle AND I've used the F/J/M
> spindles (diplomat or 5th Ave). I noticed
> virtully NO difference in the ride or performance with
> either spindle. I have also run the calipers in the
> front and the calipers behind the spindles, again, no
> difference. Just the brake line routing is
> different.....same hose. Moving the
> calipers to the back can buy you more room for an
> aftermarket sway bar. I like to run Addco 1 1/8" bars.
> cheeeeep and super solid. The early and later B bodies
> use the heavier BJ, so no UCA swap is required.
>
> Any swap can be done badly. I've got a 65 Coronet
> rolling chassis. The previous owner swapped it over to
> disks, while complete "rebuilding" the front
> end. I just looked quickly, but someone did
> a crap job on the swap. The rotors are cut too thin, and
> have re-rusted. 1 stud is loose in 1 rotor. I
> removed the dust caps, and the spindle nut didn't have a
> retainer ORa cotter pin!.....that nut could just walk right
> off, and there goes the wheel! The whole job is
> suspect. Its amazing how much of a F-up some people's
> work is.
>
> My parts usage on a typical swap;
>
> At the parts counter, I will tell them the vehicle is a
> 1973 Dodge Dart for: Rotors/bearings/hoses and master
> cylinder. Note: You need to make sure you have the
> proper drum/disk pushrod.
> For the calipers, I have used: 73 Dart
> (4067-4068) $37 plus $60 core at Rock
> Auto! or 78 Aspen (4103-4104)
> $22 plus $30 core at Rock Auto. CAREFUL HERE; the
> difference between the two different part number is the
> piston bore. the 73 Dart uses a 2.6" bore, the later
> Aspen/diplomat/5th ave uses a 2.75"
> bore. The 2.75" bore calipers are; more
> plentiful, cheaper, and give more stopping
> power. The proportioning valves are
> available new as repops for ~ $90. worth buying new
> here or OR use a 73 Dart . The prop. body style
> changed from a brass one, to a cast iron one in 1975 on the
> darts. The later F/J/Ms used the cast iron valves
> too. It really depends on the look you want.
>
> Once I got a set of R/L calipers for a 73 Dart. I had
> everything put together, and the car pulled to the right
> when braking. I rechecked EVERYTHING....still
> pulled. I eventually found I was sent one 2.6" bore
> and one 2.75" bore caliper!!!!
>
>
> For more info on prop valves, go to the MP brakes website
> and read up. Its actually a combination valve.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <chymar01@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:01 PM
> Subject: Re: disc brakes - caution, another long read with
> part numbers and prices
>
>
> >
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > I hear ya on this part! Here's a link to my 64 Polara
> convertible right after I did the swap on it in August.
> > http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/view/21824735
> > The pics there show exactly what happens when you use
> the cheapo Advance Auto brake holddown hardware. I replaced
> it all with TWO sets of NAPA parts. No more climbing
> calipers...
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Charette"
> <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 6:48:35 PM GMT -05:00
> US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: RE: disc brakes - caution, another long read
> with part numbers and prices
> >
> >
> > "One note from personal experience - get good quality
> (read that Made in USA)
> > caliper hold-down hardware. Only a couple bucks more
> than imported stuff
> > that I have had problems with in the past - consider
> the prospect of the
> > caliper jumping up out of the bracket over bumps. Not
> cool. "
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.
> I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network