Re: IML: Imperial "Rarity" in collector terms?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Imperial "Rarity" in collector terms?
- From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:50:24 -0400
I think the real question would be "known to who?"
Paul W.
-----Original Message-----
From: RCAJazz1@xxxxxxx
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 1:32 pm
Subject: IML: Imperial "Rarity" in collector terms?
A 1964 Chrysler Imperial Convertible ad now running on Ebay posits that
are are "fewer than a 100 still known to exist." As the owner of one,
I'm curious how anyone arrives at that figure - not than I'm debating,
or even inclined to debate it. Any wisdom on the accuracy and method to
determine such a thing?
One guideline I supppose would the number registered on IML....
BTW, there are now THREE of the "100" 1964 Convertibles at auction
right now on Ebay! (LOL?)
Rex Allen
64 Imp Convertible
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network