
RE: Speaking of gasoline
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Speaking of gasoline
- From: William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
You are not the only one dated.
I remeber the gas wars of minus 10 cents per gallon and White Castles being 5 cents each.
Of course the average wage was around $2.00 per hour unless you baled hay and then you were paid 3 cents a bail.
Later
Bill Harrison
65 Coronet 2 dr post
--- On Thu, 4/1/10, Jeff Adams <ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jeff Adams <ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Speaking of gasoline
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 6:05 PM
>
> OK, I'm really dating myself here, but I lived in Lawndale,
> Cafifornia
> in the early 60's and in 1965 there were 2 gas stations on
> the corner of
> my street in gas wars, and their signs said .099 per
> gallon!
> mopar383fury@xxxxxxx
> wrote:
> >
> > Gas was .55-.65 a gallon???? When was this
> mythical time? I thought it
> > was only in legend, myth, and song! Cheapest I
> ever remember was .99 in
> > 1999 here in California. I miss those days!
> >
> > Dodge recommends 89 for my 08 Hemi, I use 87 and see
> no difference.
> > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Bailey <bb64d440@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:02:18
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Speaking o f gasoline
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...I only buy brand (new) name gasoline for my cars
> but I will use the
> > off brand (second hand) gas in my lawn equipment. Why?
>
> >
> > I put the last 30 years of my working career
> employed by a liquid
> > petroleum pipeline company as a mechanic
> servicing pumps, motors valves
> > etc all relating to the safe movement and
> handling of liquid petroleum
> > products. This, by no means makes me any kind of
> authority on fossil
> > fuels or the production of gasoline, but over
> the years I’ve seen how
> > petroleum products are handled in a pipeline and
> at storage facilities.
> > I found it absolutely fascinating and my hats
> off to the people that
> > operate these systems. My point of all this is
> that all gasoline is
> > transported VIA pipeline from refineries to
> their respective
> > distribution points and then trucked to the
> sales stations. These
> > pipelines do not only carry gasoline but also
> other similar petroleum
> > products, home heating oil, diesel, etc (yes, in
> the same pipe at the
> > same time). These liquids do not mix per say
> while in the pipeline
> > because they are under constant pressure.
> However, there is a small
> > amount of what’s known as “transmix” (the
> tail end of one batch against
> > the head end of the following batch), which
> normally does occur in the
> > line. This transmix is cut out of the
> stream and stored in separate
> > tankage. Eventually you end up with a full tank
> of “accumulated
> > transmix” product, what do you with this
> stuff? It gets pumped
> > separately to a refractory, which re-refines or
> separates the different
> > products back to “useable” fuels once again.
> Hey, this is a good thing
> > right? Well, I agree to a certain extent. I
> remember ‘back in the day’
> > when brand name gas sold for say .95 per gallon
> while down the road was
> > a cheap ‘no name’ station selling gas for
> .55 or .65 cents a gal. How
> > could they do that? Like I said, I’m no expert
> but I’d bet they were
> > selling refracted gasoline but at an honest
> price. You got what you paid
> > for and it worked. Performance didn’t matter
> and so what if it smoked a
> > little more, it was cheap. So what are these no
> name gas stations
> > selling today at very nearly the same cost as
> branded gas? Well, I can’t
> > say for sure but that is my opinion of no name
> fuels and why I will only
> > buy brand new gas for my cars. I cringe every
> time I see a classic
> > muscle car filling up at a no name station!
> UGH!
> > Dave
> >
>
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and
> e-mail from your
> > inbox.
> > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_3
> >
> > --
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
> > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only
> to the intended
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will
> > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail
> and fine tune the
> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Jeff Adams
> 64 Polara
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network