
RE: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
- From: "mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx" <mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 03:46:44 GMT
I've not before heard of the difference in erosions rate dependent upon the polarity, however, I thought that a negatively polarized center electrode (generally hotter than the base electrode) could act as an electron emitter thus firing with slightly less difficulty at any given secondary voltage. In either case that can be simply controlled by ignition coil polarity without regard to ground terminals polarity.
Batteries are definitely far better today.
---------------Marshall
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "Richard Barber" <C300@xxxxxxx>
To: "'John'" <john@xxxxxxxxx>, <mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx>, <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <c300c@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:17:21 -0700
The 1955 Chrysler Service Manual indicates the Model C-70 (Crown Imperial)
was still a 12-Volt, positive ground system. As I recall, one of the
arguments for positive or negative ground was the erosion rate of spark
plugs' center electrode. Chrysler and Ford finally yielded to the General.
In those days, carbon and lead fouling damaged spark plugs way before
erosion set in.
Novice grease monkeys like me had to be on our toes when we connected
battery chargers or installed new batteries. On fast charge a lot of
hydrogen and acid mist was generated as we poured the cobs to those
miserable old batteries. Pops were frequent and battery explosions were not
unknown. The presence of the acid fumes guaranteed rapid buildup of
corrosion around the battery terminals. Sears' Diehards were a great
improvement and they had a big share of the battery business when their
improved quality and warranty hit the market. OEM batteries were typically
good for only one year. In Des Moines, we even had an outfit that rebuilt
old batteries by installing new guts into old cases. Our OEM 2005 Durango
battery is nearly six years old and doing fine. I see it has an insulator
around it, presumably to protect it against underhood heat. And, the two
6-Volt Trojan deep-cycle batteries in our RV are over 16 years old. They
are kept charged by a rooftop solar cell.
Interested parties may want to view:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandro_Volta to read up on the man whose
last name is the basis for the word Volt and about early batteries.
C-300'ly,
Rich Barber
Brentwood, CA
1955 Chrysler C68-300
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:22 PM
To: mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx; Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; c300c@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
1956 was the first year that Chrysler used 12 volt negative ground systems.
The one exception I can think of is on the Crown Imperial Limos and eight
passenger sedans through at least 1954 used a 12 volt system but it was
still positive ground.
John Lazenby
----- Original Message -----
From: c300c@xxxxxxx
To: mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx ; Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
Marshall,
I am not sure about 1956 300-Bs, but from 1957 forward, Chryslers all use
negative grounding.
300'ly, Gary Hagy
In a message dated 6/7/2010 2:36:09 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx writes:
I misstated the reconnect sequence. I meant to say reconnect the "hot"
cable first, the reverse sequence of the disconnect. I say "hot" instead of
"pos" or "neg" because our c300s are positive ground systems, making the
"hot" wires negative polarity.
--------------marshall
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Chrysler 300 Broadcast <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Quick-Disconnect Battery Cable
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:45:31 -0500
Marshall is absolutely right. If the ground is attached first, it's way
too easy for the carless wrench tightening the positive cable to touch
ground.
But, the real reason is that a battery is a storage devise for stored
energy.
Electricity, the stored energy, is a strange critter, it always wants to
work.
So if you hook up the ground first, and one or more items in the car are
on, then there will be a spark as the connector gets near the + terminal.
The stored energy will "Leap" across the gap to go to work and supply the
items that are on, with power.
If the + terminal is hooked up, and you are attaching the -, ground, last,
then the work is done and there will be no or very little spark.
This really comes in play if you have run down the battery and there is
hydrogen gas laying on top of the battery. A product of heavy discharge.
This is also why you ALWAYS attach the + jumper cable first to the Battery
and the - cable to a ground somewhere away from the battery.
i had a battery blow up in my face and I knew better, but was in a hurry
and careless.
The watchband he tells about became the "work" since it connected the
power to ground and the watchband, not being real work, created a short.
A tiny light bulb is work as is a big starter motor, and the electric
critter is happy dealing with them.
Take the work out and just put the Positive to ground, and they call that
electric welding. Or in the case above wrist burning.
Ray
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:58 PM, mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx wrote:
The reason you should disconnect the ground cable first, reconnect the
"hot" cable last is so that you don't risk shorting your circuit with your
wrench as you work with the "hot" cable.
A short circuit with good conductors (low resistance) such as a half inch
box wrench will get very hot very fast with 200+amps running through
it-----makes you want to turn it loose real quick!!!!!!!
Take heed of that hazard and always disconnect the ground cable when doing
any kind of work on your car that might bring you in contact with a "hot"
terminal, especially if you wear a watch, ring, necklace, bracelet, metal
belt buckle, or maybe other hazards. A friend of mine ignored that rule and
once got a severe burn on his left wrist from contacting the power-in lead
terminal of the distributor with his watchband while the engine was
running. HE LEARNED!!!!
Not a complex scientific theorem.
____________________________________________________________
2547% Penny Stock Picks?
Our last pick exploded 2547% - Join our free newsletter today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4c0dbd5e120412baf48st05duc
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap